Knowing your system – Part 8 – On the road to upstream

How did I start contributing?

When I started to really dig into my system to fully understand how it works, breaking everything to know of to fix it, I decided to do even worse and started using scm packages.

Scm packages download the source code directly for the upstream development repository using git, subversion, mercurial or whatever other vcs.

Doing this I ended up with a more-that-bleeding-edge system, causing a lot of breakages when stuff went incompatible with recent versions of other. That's perfect, since that's exactly the state I wanted to reach. If I wanted to recover a functional system, the easy solution that I adopted when I did not have much spare time was to revert my last changes and get back to an earlier version of the guilty package, but this was not the goal of the operation. What I really started to do at this point was to patch the broken stuff to make it compatible with the newer version of the guilty stuff which broke everything. It was sometimes really trivial, sometimes way less. I mostly did this for Gnome projects. It's a really good experience since you have to dig in a lot of projects and documentation, making you know better how various parts of your system work internally. Once I had everything back working, I then submitted my patches to the developers of the projects upstream, so that it gets fixed for everyone.

Now that I have way less spare time, I no longer have such a bleeding edge system, or at least I have way less scm packages. Sometimes I still need to patch stuff though, so I still use the same procedure.

My workflow

My workflow for contributing to upstream is not much different to the one I use for contributing to Exherbo. I also use an autopatch mechanism which is slightly different. My hook for automatically patch software is available there: https://github.com/Keruspe/paludis-config/blob/exherbo/hooks/ebuild_prepare_pre/patches.bash. If I remember correctly it was initially written by Ciaran McCreesh, the paludis's lead developer. When I want to patch something, I get a copy locally, I write and commit my patch, I generate a patch file and move it to /etc/paludis/autopatch/<category>/<package>/ where <category> is for example "x11-dri" and <package> is "mesa", according to exherbo's packages name. Each time I install a package, it applies all this patches before configuring and compiling the software. If it works, I submit it upstream, if not, I fix it and retry.

I highly recommend you to try contributing to open source projects, to fix or improve them, like adding new functionalities. The only risk is to learn a lot.

Blog

À lire également

Cloud modernisation: how to align governance and operations without adding complexity

European organisations are managing increasingly heterogeneous environments: legacy applications, cloud-native services, multi-cloud setups and regulatory constraints are accumulating within information systems rarely designed to handle such diversity.
Engineering Event Guests

Clever Cloud launches Clever Kubernetes Engine (CKE) in public beta on April 27, 2026

Previewed at Devoxx starting April 22, CKE is the culmination of two years of R&D built around a complete reimplementation of Kubernetes.
Company Engineering Press

The DEEP, OVHcloud and Clever Cloud consortium selected to deliver sovereign cloud services for European institutions

Paris – April 17, 2026 – The consortium composed of DEEP by POST Luxembourg Group, OVHcloud and Clever Cloud today announces its selection by the European Commission as part of a major procurement framework to provide sovereign cloud services to the institutions, bodies and agencies of the European Union. This contract, with a ceiling of €180 million over six years, marks a significant milestone in the concrete implementation of Europe’s digital sovereignty strategy.
Company