Knowing your system – Part 8 – On the road to upstream

How did I start contributing?

When I started to really dig into my system to fully understand how it works, breaking everything to know of to fix it, I decided to do even worse and started using scm packages.

Scm packages download the source code directly for the upstream development repository using git, subversion, mercurial or whatever other vcs.

Doing this I ended up with a more-that-bleeding-edge system, causing a lot of breakages when stuff went incompatible with recent versions of other. That's perfect, since that's exactly the state I wanted to reach. If I wanted to recover a functional system, the easy solution that I adopted when I did not have much spare time was to revert my last changes and get back to an earlier version of the guilty package, but this was not the goal of the operation. What I really started to do at this point was to patch the broken stuff to make it compatible with the newer version of the guilty stuff which broke everything. It was sometimes really trivial, sometimes way less. I mostly did this for Gnome projects. It's a really good experience since you have to dig in a lot of projects and documentation, making you know better how various parts of your system work internally. Once I had everything back working, I then submitted my patches to the developers of the projects upstream, so that it gets fixed for everyone.

Now that I have way less spare time, I no longer have such a bleeding edge system, or at least I have way less scm packages. Sometimes I still need to patch stuff though, so I still use the same procedure.

My workflow

My workflow for contributing to upstream is not much different to the one I use for contributing to Exherbo. I also use an autopatch mechanism which is slightly different. My hook for automatically patch software is available there: https://github.com/Keruspe/paludis-config/blob/exherbo/hooks/ebuild_prepare_pre/patches.bash. If I remember correctly it was initially written by Ciaran McCreesh, the paludis's lead developer. When I want to patch something, I get a copy locally, I write and commit my patch, I generate a patch file and move it to /etc/paludis/autopatch/<category>/<package>/ where <category> is for example "x11-dri" and <package> is "mesa", according to exherbo's packages name. Each time I install a package, it applies all this patches before configuring and compiling the software. If it works, I submit it upstream, if not, I fix it and retry.

I highly recommend you to try contributing to open source projects, to fix or improve them, like adding new functionalities. The only risk is to learn a lot.

Blog

À lire également

French Managed Kubernetes: What Are the Alternatives to Hyperscalers in 2026?

French managed Kubernetes services provide organisations with European alternatives to AWS EKS, Google GKE and Azure AKS. OVHcloud, Scaleway and Clever Cloud now offer such services on infrastructure located in France or elsewhere in Europe. However, choosing a French managed Kubernetes service involves more than server location: the infrastructure model, the division of operational responsibilities and integration with other cloud services are equally important.
This article compares the three offerings and outlines the key criteria for making a decision.
Engineering Features

Quentin Adam on Underscore_: how do you industrialize AI in software development?

Quentin Adam, CEO of Clever Cloud, is back on Underscore_ with Micode and Matthieu Lambda. After a first episode focused on cloud computing and digital sovereignty, this new conversation tackles another transformation: what artificial intelligence really changes in software development once you move beyond experimentation.
Company

See You at Tech Alternatives Nantes

On September 18, 2026, Clever Cloud co-organizes Tech Alternatives Nantes, alongside a dozen companies and three local associations and professional networks.
Event